Cumberbatch on cover of The New York Times magazine |
At the time I was considering a grand career on the stage —
I was maybe 17 — my models were the four British sirs. There was Ralph Richardson, Lawrence
Olivier, John Gielgud and Alec Guinness. I watched them closely over the years. They
were all bigger than life. Under closer
scrutiny, I discovered, with the exception of Guinness, it was hard to separate
the actor from the role. We were always
aware we were watching Gielgud perform.
It was marvelous, but not much different than the American actor as
celebrity. The star, John Wayne,
let’s say, seeped through any character he played. Some might blame typecasting,
but I would suggest that there were limitations having to do with talent, dedication
and range. Of the big four, only
Guinness was truly able to transcend personality. Currently, only a few of the
big names can do it consistently. Daniel
Day-Lewis is one. Cate Blanchett
is another. So is Meryl Streep. Joseph
Gordon-Levitt seems to be on his way.
Benedict Cumberbatch
is now revealing this range. He is the dazzling, eccentric flamboyant Sherlock
on the BBC series. Earlier he was almost
invisible, certainly appropriately bland, as a second banana bureaucrat in John Le Carre’s Tinker, Tailor, Soldier. Spy, a fine 2011 remake of a highly
regarded Guinness film. He also had a
low-key heroic role in a three-part period piece based on William Golding’s sea-trilogy To
The Ends of the Earth. These were not remotely similar roles, and to each
he gave individual life He doesn’t so
much inhabit the character as allow the character to inhabit him. Recently, he
portrayed such distinctly different characters as physicist Stephen Hawking and political provocateur
Julian Assange. He’s also opened up
to roles in pop fantasy films and done voice-overs in animated productions. He
is an original. My guess is that some
day he will be knighted. But that’s the least of it. He appears quite able to
transcend the cult of personality and, despite an apparent finely developed
sense of humor, join the ranks of very serious, very talented actors.
2 comments:
And yet, you've always been part Clifton Webb/part Richard Widmark to me.
That's exactly who I am Clifton Widmark. No, really.
Post a Comment